Geometric morphometric analysis of Eysarcoris guttiger, E. annamita and E. ventralis (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Rongrong Li, Hufang Zhang, Shengcai Li, Ming Bai

Zoological Systematics ›› 2017, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 90-101.

PDF(1232 KB)
PDF(1232 KB)
Zoological Systematics ›› 2017, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 90-101. DOI: 10.11865/zs.201708
Original Paper

Geometric morphometric analysis of Eysarcoris guttiger, E. annamita and E. ventralis (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

  • Rongrong Li1, Hufang Zhang1, 2, Shengcai Li1 *, Ming Bai3 *
作者信息 +

Geometric morphometric analysis of Eysarcoris guttiger, E. annamita and E. ventralis (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

  • Rongrong Li1, Hufang Zhang1, 2, Shengcai Li1 *, Ming Bai3 *
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

The genus Eysarcoris can be easily distinguished from other genera through the two spots in the basal angle of the scutellum. Nevertheless, Eysarcoris species show complex variances. Geometric morphometric methods have been increasingly applied to distinguish species and to define the boundary of genera among insects. In the present study, geometric morphometric approach was firstly employed to evaluate the shape variation of three characters (fore wing, hind wing and pygophore) of E. guttiger, E. annamita and E. ventralis using E. aeneus as outgroup to ascertain whether this approach is a reliable method for the taxonomy of Eysarcoris. Analysis was conducted on the landmarks of the three characters of these species. Multivariate regression of procrustes coordinates against centroid size was conducted to test the presence of allometry. Principal component analysis (PCA), canonical variate analysis (CVA) and cluster analysis were utilized to describe variations in shapes among the studied species. For all of the three characters, though PCA analysis showed some overlap among species, p-values for procrustes distance and mahalanobis distance were all less than 0.0001. The distribution of the three studied species corresponds with their species status. This study demonstrates that the geometric morphometrics of both the fore wing and the hind wing might represent a possible tool for the identification of species within this genus.

Abstract

The genus Eysarcoris can be easily distinguished from other genera through the two spots in the basal angle of the scutellum. Nevertheless, Eysarcoris species show complex variances. Geometric morphometric methods have been increasingly applied to distinguish species and to define the boundary of genera among insects. In the present study, geometric morphometric approach was firstly employed to evaluate the shape variation of three characters (fore wing, hind wing and pygophore) of E. guttiger, E. annamita and E. ventralis using E. aeneus as outgroup to ascertain whether this approach is a reliable method for the taxonomy of Eysarcoris. Analysis was conducted on the landmarks of the three characters of these species. Multivariate regression of procrustes coordinates against centroid size was conducted to test the presence of allometry. Principal component analysis (PCA), canonical variate analysis (CVA) and cluster analysis were utilized to describe variations in shapes among the studied species. For all of the three characters, though PCA analysis showed some overlap among species, p-values for procrustes distance and mahalanobis distance were all less than 0.0001. The distribution of the three studied species corresponds with their species status. This study demonstrates that the geometric morphometrics of both the fore wing and the hind wing might represent a possible tool for the identification of species within this genus.

引用本文

导出引用
Rongrong Li, Hufang Zhang, Shengcai Li, Ming Bai. Geometric morphometric analysis of Eysarcoris guttiger, E. annamita and E. ventralis (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)[J]. Zoological Systematics. 2017, 42(1): 90-101 https://doi.org/10.11865/zs.201708
Rongrong Li, Hufang Zhang, Shengcai Li, Ming Bai. Geometric morphometric analysis of Eysarcoris guttiger, E. annamita and E. ventralis (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)[J]. Zoological Systematics. 2017, 42(1): 90-101 https://doi.org/10.11865/zs.201708

基金

The project was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (31440078, 31501876, 31501840), Shanxi Province Programs for Science and Technology Development (20150311010-7), the Research Equipment Development Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (YZ201509), and the Graduate Innovation Project in Shanxi Province, China (2016BY067)

PDF(1232 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/